Journal of Measurement and Evaluation
JME, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2026, pp.1-20.
Print ISSN: 3106-0463; Online ISSN: 3106-0471
Journal homepage: https://www.jmeacta.com
DOI:Https://doi.org/10.64058/JME.26.1.01
Issues and Approaches to Constructing a Chinese-characteristic Philosophy and Social Science Evaluation System within the Perspective of All-round Academic Evaluation
Ye Jiyuan, Shen Xinyong(translator)
Abstract: Grounded in the current status of philosophy and social science research in China and evaluation practices at home and abroad, this article discusses the significance of constructing an evaluation system for Chinese-characteristics philosophy and social science within the perspective of all-round academic evaluation. It elaborates on key aspects such as the positioning of evaluation needs, theoretical framework, system construction, empirical analysis, meta-evaluation and promotion, and the design of a data service plat-form, providing corresponding implementation approaches. Furthermore, it analyzes key issues, major challenges, and innovative aspects in the construction of the evaluation system.
Keywords: All-round academic evaluation system; Chinese characteristics; Philosophy and social science; Evaluation system; National Social Science Fund Major Project
Author Biographies: Ye Jiyuan serves as a Distinguished Professor at the School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, China. Shen Xinyong (translator), corresponding author, Master's student at the School of Statistics and Data Science, Zhejiang Gongshang University. His research interests include policy and science & technology evaluation, E-mail: shenxinyong@outlook.com.
Received: 05 Dec 2025 / Revised: 31 Dec 2025 / Accepted: 14 Jan 2026 / Published online: 30 Apr 2026 / Print published: 30 May 2026.
This article is an English translation of the following Chinese article: Ye, J. (2025). Issues and Approaches to Constructing a Chinese-characteristic Philosophy and Social Science Evaluation System within the Perspective of All-round Academic Evaluation. Library Work and Study, (1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.16384/j.cnki.lwas.2025.01.006


DOWNLOAD PDF